Skip to content
OQuark

n8n vs Make

n8n and Make compete in Agents and automation. We show the editorial position of each and the published criteria — AI Rankings never crowns a paid “winner” and never reorders for sponsorship.

Position in the Agents and automation ranking

Position comes only from the ranking criteria (rule R1). When there's an affiliate link, it's labeled and never changes the order (R5).

Side by side

Criterionn8nMake
Ranking position#1#3
Free planYesYes
Starting price——
Speaks Portuguese?not verifiednot verified

What we verified

#1

n8n

n8n

Visit official site
Best for
Technical teams (IT Ops, SecOps, DevOps, sales and developers) that need to automate workflows and AI agents visually, with the ability to go deeper with code and connect to anything.

Verified on October 17, 2026 · official site

On the free plan
n8n offers a self-hosted Community Edition that is free and runs without a license key, with almost the complete feature set. Excluded are features such as variables/environments, SSO (SAML, LDAP), projects, external secrets and Git-based version control. The cloud plans include a free trial with no card.

Verified on October 17, 2026 · official site

Why it's ranked here
Most flexible for AI and agent workflows, with a self-hosting option and source-available (fair-code) license.

Verified on October 17, 2026 · official site

#3

Make

Make (Celonis)

Visit official site
Why it's ranked here
Good middle ground between n8n's power and Zapier's ease, usually cheaper than Zapier.

Verified on October 14, 2026 · official site

How we compare

Both are judged by the same Agents and automation criteria:

Number of integrations, flexibility for complex AI workflows, self-hosting option, learning curve and cost per run.

Follow the AI rankings and launches

One e-mail a week with the rankings that changed and the AI launches that matter. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

See how we handle your data in our Privacy Policy.

What's in the newsletter