Skip to content
OQuark

Cursor vs Devin Desktop

Cursor and Devin Desktop compete in Coding. We show the editorial position of each and the published criteria — AI Rankings never crowns a paid “winner” and never reorders for sponsorship.

Position in the Coding ranking

Position comes only from the ranking criteria (rule R1). When there's an affiliate link, it's labeled and never changes the order (R5).

Side by side

CriterionCursorDevin Desktop
Ranking position#2#5
Free planYesYes
Starting priceUS$ 8/mo—
Speaks Portuguese?not verifiednot verified

What we verified

#2

Cursor

Anysphere

Visit official site
Best for
Teams and developers who want a coding agent integrated into the editor, with AI agents that work in parallel and integration with terminal/CLI, Slack, GitHub and the IDE.

Verified on October 17, 2026 · official site

On the free plan
The Free plan (US$0/month) offers access to Agent and Chat with limited usage, using only Cursor's own models. It does not include third-party models, Auto mode, Cloud Agents, Automations, Bugbot or Origin.

Verified on October 17, 2026 · official site

Why it's ranked here
The best AI-native IDE experience, with fast autocomplete and a choice of models; great if you prefer to review every change.

Verified on October 17, 2026 · official site

#5

Devin Desktop

Cognition

Visit official site
Why it's ranked here
Solid Cursor alternative, now folded into Cognition's Devin family (Windsurf became Devin Desktop in Jun/2026); smaller community and ecosystem.

Verified on October 19, 2026 · official site

How we compare

Both are judged by the same Coding criteria:

Ability to finish real tasks in large codebases, autonomy as an agent, workflow integration (terminal, IDE, GitHub) and cost for daily use.

Follow the AI rankings and launches

One e-mail a week with the rankings that changed and the AI launches that matter. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

See how we handle your data in our Privacy Policy.

What's in the newsletter