# Claude Code vs Cursor

> Claude Code and Cursor compete in Coding. We show the editorial position of each and the published criteria — AI Rankings never crowns a paid “winner” and never reorders for sponsorship.

_Updated October 28, 2026 · AI Rankings (OQuark)_

## Position in the Coding ranking

- Claude Code: #1
- Cursor: #2

Position comes only from the ranking criteria (rule R1). When there's an affiliate link, it's labeled and never changes the order (R5).

## Side by side

| Criterion | Claude Code | Cursor |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ranking position | #1 | #2 |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Starting price | US$ 20/mo (Claude Pro plan; US$17/month billed annually) | US$ 8/mo |
| Speaks Portuguese? | not verified | not verified |

## What we verified

### Claude Code — Anthropic

Why it ranks here: The benchmark for long, autonomous tasks in large codebases; the agent that most popularized the terminal-first, delegate-the-work workflow.

Official site: https://claude.com/product/claude-code

### Cursor — Anysphere

Why it ranks here: The best AI-native IDE experience, with fast autocomplete and a choice of models; great if you prefer to review every change.

Official site: https://cursor.com

## How we compare

Both are judged by the same Coding criteria:

Ability to finish real tasks in large codebases, autonomy as an agent, workflow integration (terminal, IDE, GitHub) and cost for daily use.

---

Editorial ranking by OQuark — never for sale (rule R1). Positions come only from the published criteria; no payment buys, raises or protects a place.

- See the full Coding ranking: https://oquark.io/ai-rankings/en/use-cases/coding
- Alternatives to Claude Code: https://oquark.io/ai-rankings/en/alternatives/claude-code
- Alternatives to Cursor: https://oquark.io/ai-rankings/en/alternatives/cursor
- Methodology: https://oquark.io/ai-rankings/en/methodology
- Web page: https://oquark.io/ai-rankings/en/compare/claude-code-vs-cursor
- This document: https://oquark.io/ai-rankings/en/compare/claude-code-vs-cursor/index.md